Anti-Autorun Removal Collection

Anti-Auto run Collection
autorun.inf , Copy.exe, temp1.exe , temp2.exe
tools to remove aoturun virus

download

mega upload
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=RQV77MMM

Zshare
http://www.zshare.net/download/16107846e506a466


Words in Love

Nice words wisdom and poems, Words in Love, Short Stories
Just here

American muscle, Japanese mind

The 1980s was the decade whence Japanese cars were finally making their mark an indelible one on the US market, and while despite still being prone to some Jingoist ridicule from some corners, they were offering products which though better in quality and efficiency, were nonetheless different than US cars. Skip forward to the 1990s onwards and one will notice that many US cars seem to take many of their cues from the Japanese and that the US’ most popular selling car is also Japanese. Of course this hasn’t been a complete one-way street, for the Japanese carmakers have learned to better appeal to the US car buyer with bigger space, displacement and trinkets, but what has changed is that the Japanese have studied their target market and its tastes and requirements so well that some of the best full-size road-biased SUVs, formerly a unique US niche, are now Japanese.
With a 5.6 litre V8, a gross weight of 3175kg and seating for seven people, the Nissan Armada is not just a car squarely aimed at the US market and on a secondary basis the Gulf market, but is in fact US built, in an act of almost reverse colonialism or a profitable goodwill gesture, by which it also provides jobs for the same Americans it serves. Unlike some other SUVs of this class, the Armada’s massive size feels well utilised and reflected by the generous limo-like interior space, with first and second row seating being exceptionally spacious and comfortable in terms of head and leg space, in addition to a decent third row, rather than one aimed at the dwarf market. Getting in and out of the Armada is also gracious and dignified, with big and wide opening doors due to a longer wheelbase than some other SUVs, which suffer from door length loss to the rear wheel arches. Incidentally, the longer wheelbase and shorter overhangs also make the Armada more stable and help with handling. The Armada also impresses with its high quality and generous equipment and luxury levels that are so aesthetic, functional and spacious that my one minor grip concerns the orange surround on the central dial in the instrument cowl.
Grace and dignity are a recurring Armada theme, with these qualities also on display in its exterior styling and lines starting from its elegant yet aggressively butch grille and bulgingly muscular bodywork. With almost equal height and width and long length, the Armada is an almost exact rectangle, which is a basic and visually correct shape. This rectangular shape is broken up into two distinct sections, with the front two rows featuring a slightly bulbous arced roofline, which becomes a sharp straight rear roofline and in effect this integrated contrast gives the Armada’s silhouette a visually arresting and aesthetically interesting contour. Complementing this are the minimalist hidden rear door handles.
While not a sports-SUV like the Range Rover Sport, Porsche Cayenne or even the BMW X5, the Armada is rather of the full-size CIA-mobile type of SUV made primarily for utility and comfort for the long haul, towing and some occasional off-roading, but will also be used as a daily driver by many US and Gulf families and glitz-mobile for some. Within these parameters, I was astounded by the Armada’s poise, grace and skill, as vehicles this big and heavy, built on an old-school ladder-frame chassis are not expected to handle so well. In absolute terms this is not the best off-roader or best handling SUV, but it isn’t meant to be the best in either, rather, it is a mammoth luxo-SUV with intriguingly car-like handling.
The main reason for the Armada’s terrific driving dynamics is its independent double wishbone rear suspension, which is a rarity in this US-dominated segment of full-size luxo-SUVs, in contrast with most US designs, which are effectively tricked out truck designs, utilising a live rear axle, which while terrific for cost-cutting, durability and general heavy-duty and industrial use, is however awful in terms of handling, agility and driving dynamics. A faced paced drive through desert plains with a tight, very badly paved and twisty (and dusty) road, during which we put the Armada through its paces, its superior and sophisticated suspension ironed out much of the rough road texture and allowed for a high- speed sprint that couldn’t be performed at this level of speed, control or poise by many of its rivals. On the many quick and successive bends and twists in the road, with 4x4 engaged, the Armada proved spectacular in its body control and re-assuring agility which belied the height, weight and body on chassis architecture. In addition to the longer wheelbase proportion and the independent suspension, the Armada’s gas-powered dampers were the third main ingredient in its ability to ride and handle with such comfort, control, grace and poise.
Complementing the Armada’s size, style, refinement and driving ability, is a powerhouse 5.6 litre V8 engine, which with its DOHC 32-valve set-up is much more sophisticated than its US rivals, but also unleashes a very potent, rich and early available torque output of 393lb/ft (SAE Net) peaking at 3400rpm very able to launch and propel the Armada with aplomb. While its engine is geared more for high torque to shift its mass, the big V8 also offers a hefty and honest 320hp (SAE Net) at a well-paced 5200rpm, that makes for a well-judged, smooth and natural transition from torque to power and ultimately provides for relaxed cruising, confident overtaking and reassured high- speed driving. Tough good looks, decent off-road skills, enormous space, luxury, convenience and creature comforts, as well as exquisite driving dynamics and terrific power make the Nissan Armada a special vehicle indeed, as the thinking man’s barge-sized luxo-SUV cruiser able to deal with the dynamic requirements of a variety of driving and road conditions rather than being a one party-trick straight line cruiser.

Seventh Heaven with Windows Seven

A new name in the world of computers is delighting some and scaring others: Microsoft Windows Seven (W7).
It is the company’s upcoming operating system, the successor of the current Windows Vista. No exact date has yet been set for the commercial release of the product, but the mere announcement of its existence is sending shockwaves across the IT community.
W7 is just a code name for now and Microsoft may decide to rename when it is officially released. The essential new feature of W7 is empowering the user to manipulate files, mainly multimedia files, as simply and as easily as one does it with Apple’s iPhone: by touching and dragging the files-objects on the very screen, without any mouse or keyboard manipulation.
It is the fastest, most user-friendly and intuitive manner to move, copy, see, enlarge and close photos, files, music and so forth. From this viewpoint, users can’t wait to put their hands on W7.
What is rather strange is the timing. Chronologically Windows XP came around in 2001, Vista in 2007 and W7 will probably be available in 2009.
Vista, therefore, has only been around for a little more than year. This is very short period in terms of an operating system’s lifespan. Most Microsoft’s Windows have existed an average of four to five years.
Moreover, Vista predecessor, Windows XP, remains the most appreciated system today, and has been around for seven good years.
XP has proven to be the most stable, the least prone to crash. Windows XP has its fans and many of them have refused to move to Vista so far. There was even a petition on the web asking Microsoft not to discontinue their technical support for XP.
Vista, with all its technical advantages is a very “heavy” system. It requires exceptionally powerful computers to operate properly, especially in terms of graphics. Unless one has a machine with extensive graphics power, Vista will appear to respond as a slow system, irritating the user who had got accustomed to the fast Windows XP.
So, why is Microsoft announcing W7 when even Vista has not been widely adopted and remains a controversial issue? Only Microsoft can answer this, and we can only try guessing.
It could be that Vista was planned from the very start as a short-lived, temporary transition between XP and W7, in which case all those who went Vista (including the writer of this article) served as Guinea pigs for Microsoft. Another explanation is that Microsoft finally took notice of the frustration of Vista users and decided to accelerate the development and the release of W7 to address this frustration.
Those who have ignored Vista and stayed with XP are looking forward to W7. They consider they have wisely “skipped” the Vista painful experiment, if it ever was an experiment, and will take a quantum leap when they shift to W7. Those who took the plunge with Vista and remain unhappy with its performance will look forward to W7 as a long-awaited relief, as a deliverance from its excessive weight and idiosyncrasy.
If there are many unanswered questions about Vista and W7, one thing is certain. The trend in technology is towards intensive, heavy graphics. It is apparent not only in computers, but in the entire range of the new cell phones.
How well and how fast will intensive graphics work on your computer depends on the graphic processor and the memory allocated to it. In most cases the user has the possibility to expand this part of his computer by adding graphic memory or changing and upgrading the graphic controller. This is where one should not cut corners. It is only then that one would be ready for W7.